PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (AT1S.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AT1S.L is traded in GBp, while XYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AT1S.L achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD.L's 0.47% return.


AT1S.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.47%
YTD
2.03%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*

XYLD.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
-0.93%
6M
0.21%
YTD
0.47%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1S.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
2.03%10.47%9.80%1.39%-11.03%3.09%5.25%16.25%-3.05%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
0.47%-1.36%6.72%0.43%2.18%1.29%7.10%9.23%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AT1S.L and XYLD.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2018

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AT1S.L
AT1S.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AT1S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD.L
XYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (AT1S.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AT1S.LXYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

0.56

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

1.57

+6.30

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AT1S.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AT1S.L and XYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AT1S.L drawdown since its inception was -29.25%, which is greater than XYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1S.L and XYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AT1S.LXYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.25%

-15.49%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-5.01%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.20%

-8.75%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-15.49%

-10.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-4.77%

+4.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-5.18%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.79%

-0.91%

Volatility

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (AT1S.L) is 0.87%, while Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that AT1S.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AT1S.LXYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

2.10%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

4.94%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

6.36%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.57%

8.23%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

9.30%

+2.11%

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AT1S.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD.L's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

AT1S.L vs. XYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

AT1S.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than XYLD.L's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1S.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
6.00%5.91%6.29%6.12%6.02%4.36%5.31%5.45%1.13%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
3.76%3.61%3.34%2.88%6.03%3.88%3.78%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AT1S.L and XYLD.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XYLD.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XYLD.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1S.L.

AT1S.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XYLD.L is Corporate Bonds. AT1S.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while XYLD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AT1S.L and 0.16% for XYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AT1S.L and XYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer