PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AT1.L vs. AT1P.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AT1.L is traded in USD, while AT1P.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AT1P.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AT1.L having a 1.81% return and AT1P.L slightly lower at 1.80%.


AT1.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.66%
6M
1.37%
YTD
1.81%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*

AT1P.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.74%
6M
1.14%
YTD
1.80%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc
1.81%11.12%10.24%2.35%-9.50%3.30%8.76%18.10%-1.30%
AT1P.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc
1.80%10.98%10.30%1.81%-9.65%3.82%8.06%19.42%-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AT1.L and AT1P.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between AT1.L and AT1P.L has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AT1.L
AT1.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AT1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AT1P.L
AT1P.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AT1P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AT1.LAT1P.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.79

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

8.05

-0.02

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AT1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the AT1P.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AT1.L and AT1P.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AT1.L drawdown since its inception was -28.14%, roughly equal to the maximum AT1P.L drawdown of -29.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1.L and AT1P.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AT1.LAT1P.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.14%

-29.11%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-3.92%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-4.22%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.13%

-24.64%

-0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.04%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-4.38%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.88%

-0.01%

Volatility

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1.L) is 1.20%, while Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that AT1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AT1P.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AT1.LAT1P.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.74%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.38%

4.82%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

5.66%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.48%

9.44%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.18%

11.49%

-0.31%

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AT1.L and AT1P.L have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


Dividends

AT1.L vs. AT1P.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AT1.L nor AT1P.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AT1.L and AT1P.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AT1.L and AT1P.L have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Both ETFs track iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AT1.L and AT1P.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer