ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE
ASWA.DE (HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc) and RM8U.DE (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - ASWA.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the SGI European Green Deal ESG Screened, while RM8U.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ASWA.DE returned 0.26% vs 30.06% for RM8U.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASWA.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RM8U.DE.
Performance
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASWA.DE achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly lower than RM8U.DE's 2.70% return.
ASWA.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -9.71%
- 1Y
- 0.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RM8U.DE
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 30.06%
- 3Y*
- 27.86%
- 5Y*
- 19.57%
- 10Y*
- —
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASWA.DE HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc | -10.58% | 26.07% | -11.37% | -2.40% |
RM8U.DE HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 2.70% | 48.89% | 34.03% | 5.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASWA.DE and RM8U.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASWA.DE
RM8U.DE
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASWA.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 1.81 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 4.58 | -4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASWA.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 1.30 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 1.01 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASWA.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.36%, which is greater than RM8U.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASWA.DE and RM8U.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASWA.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.36% | -18.51% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.36% | -16.54% | -13.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.85% | -15.01% | -8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -6.13% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.54% | 6.55% | +3.99% |
Volatility
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) at 5.04%. This indicates that ASWA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RM8U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASWA.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 5.04% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.06% | 20.04% | +17.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.68% | 23.03% | +10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 15.99% | +8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 16.17% | +8.55% |
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASWA.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RM8U.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASWA.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASWA.DE nor RM8U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASWA.DE and RM8U.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RM8U.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RM8U.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASWA.DE.
ASWA.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while RM8U.DE is Precious Metals. ASWA.DE tracks SGI European Green Deal ESG Screened, while RM8U.DE tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASWA.DE and 0.22% for RM8U.DE.
Find the right allocation for ASWA.DE and RM8U.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer