PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASTX vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASTX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASTX achieves a -61.97% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.


ASTX

1D
-15.53%
1M
-39.48%
6M
-77.89%
YTD
-61.97%
1Y
-42.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-9.01%
1M
-18.36%
6M
372.65%
YTD
575.80%
1Y
2,796.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASTX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASTX
Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF
-61.97%63.68%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
575.80%338.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ASTX and MUU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASTX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASTX
ASTX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ASTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ASTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASTX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASTX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASTXMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-24.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.69

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

66.09

-66.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

221.31

-222.11

ASTX vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 23.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASTX and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASTX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASTX drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTX and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASTXMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-75.07%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.62%

-52.72%

-31.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.62%

-36.32%

-48.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.33%

-23.43%

-23.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.44%

16.57%

+35.87%

Volatility

ASTX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX) has a higher volatility of 73.52% compared to Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) at 67.81%. This indicates that ASTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASTXMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

73.52%

67.81%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

163.21%

116.35%

+46.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

215.94%

145.78%

+70.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

215.62%

138.10%

+77.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

215.62%

138.10%

+77.52%

ASTX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASTX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

ASTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


PositionTTM20252024
ASTX
Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.70%4.27%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASTX and MUU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASTX has higher volatility (73.52%) compared to MUU (67.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTX dropped -84.62% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2796.55% vs -42.09% for ASTX. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, MUU has been the lower-risk option at 67.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2796.55% return vs -42.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ASTX.

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for ASTX.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ASTX and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.95 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASTX and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer