PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASTX vs. BAMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASTX vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASTX achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.


ASTX

1D
-17.56%
1M
106.50%
YTD
15.62%
6M
40.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAMU

1D
0.02%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.25%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASTX vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASTX
Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF
15.62%52.29%
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
1.06%1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ASTX and BAMU is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASTX vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASTX

BAMU
BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASTX vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASTX vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASTXBAMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

4.14

-3.73

Drawdowns

ASTX vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASTX drawdown since its inception was -80.36%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTX and BAMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASTXBAMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.36%

-0.36%

-80.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.23%

0.00%

-53.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-0.02%

-44.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

Volatility

ASTX vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASTXBAMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

212.04%

0.59%

+211.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

212.04%

0.87%

+211.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

212.04%

0.87%

+211.17%

ASTX vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASTX vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

ASTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASTX
Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
3.06%3.20%3.97%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASTX and BAMU have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ASTX.

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for ASTX.

ASTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ASTX and 1.09% for BAMU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASTX and BAMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer