ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE
ASRW.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - ASRW.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE while XDEV.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ASRW.DE returned 20.46%/yr vs 30.22%/yr for XDEV.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASRW.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.DE.
Performance
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ASRW.DE is traded in USD, while XDEV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDEV.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASRW.DE achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.DE's 33.52% return.
ASRW.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 11.91%
- YTD
- 33.52%
- 6M
- 38.09%
- 1Y
- 65.89%
- 3Y*
- 30.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRW.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc | 9.41% | 20.73% | 18.27% | 21.79% | 8.82% |
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 33.52% | 40.84% | 5.24% | 19.32% | 14.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASRW.DE and XDEV.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ASRW.DE and XDEV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASRW.DE
XDEV.DE
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASRW.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.77 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 7.71 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 28.49 | -15.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASRW.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 4.38 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.63 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.82%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.DE drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRW.DE and XDEV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASRW.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -39.48% | +22.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -8.51% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -15.97% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -1.22% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -7.25% | +5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.31% | -0.29% |
Volatility
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) is 3.35%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that ASRW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASRW.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 6.21% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 12.08% | -2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 14.96% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 15.93% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 17.02% | -2.98% |
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASRW.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEV.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ASRW.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASRW.DE nor XDEV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASRW.DE and XDEV.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASRW.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.DE.
ASRW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE, while XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ASRW.DE and 0.25% for XDEV.DE.
Find the right allocation for ASRW.DE and XDEV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer