ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS
ASRW.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IWDA.AS (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - ASRW.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE while IWDA.AS tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ASRW.DE returned 20.46%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for IWDA.AS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASRW.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.AS.
Performance
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ASRW.DE is traded in USD, while IWDA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWDA.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ASRW.DE having a 9.41% return and IWDA.AS slightly higher at 9.81%.
ASRW.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWDA.AS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 25.92%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRW.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc | 9.41% | 20.73% | 18.27% | 21.79% | 8.82% |
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.81% | 21.46% | 19.36% | 23.68% | 8.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASRW.DE and IWDA.AS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ASRW.DE and IWDA.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
ASRW.DE
IWDA.AS
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASRW.DE | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.40 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.05 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 13.17 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASRW.DE | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.22 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.68 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.82%, smaller than the maximum IWDA.AS drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRW.DE and IWDA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASRW.DE | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -34.11% | +17.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -8.39% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -17.83% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.49% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -4.64% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.95% | +0.07% |
Volatility
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) at 2.94%. This indicates that ASRW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASRW.DE | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 2.94% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 8.59% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 11.51% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 15.47% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 15.80% | -1.76% |
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASRW.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ASRW.DE vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASRW.DE nor IWDA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ASRW.DE and IWDA.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ASRW.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.AS.
ASRW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE, while IWDA.AS tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ASRW.DE and 0.20% for IWDA.AS.
Find the right allocation for ASRW.DE and IWDA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer