ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

ASRR.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - ASRR.DE tracks the MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ASRR.DE returned 11.78%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRR.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRR.DE achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 18.14% return.

ASRR.DE

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 7.40%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 1Y: 15.65%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMED.DE

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -1.82%
• 6M: 15.03%
• YTD: 18.14%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: 15.90%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ASRR.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc	11.11%	11.63%	7.07%	13.88%	-10.86%
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)	18.14%	20.15%	5.95%	16.68%	-8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRR.DE and AMED.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022	0.89

The correlation between ASRR.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRR.DE

ASRR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 38
ASRR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ASRR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ASRR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ASRR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ASRR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 38

AMED.DE

AMED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 76
AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AMED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
AMED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AMED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
AMED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRR.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASRR.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.85	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.73	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.35	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	2.67	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.54	10.34	-5.81

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRR.DE and AMED.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRR.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.26%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRR.DE and AMED.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASRR.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.26%	-38.35%	+16.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.59%	-10.56%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.94%	-14.07%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-2.75%	+1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-5.58%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	2.73%	+0.71%

Volatility

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRR.DE) is 3.12%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that ASRR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASRR.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	3.63%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	12.98%	-1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	15.28%	-1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	15.87%	-1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	17.34%	-2.57%

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASRR.DE and AMED.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ASRR.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRR.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASRR.DE and AMED.DE in my portfolio?

ASRR.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASRR.DE or AMED.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASRR.DE or AMED.DE?

ASRR.DE and AMED.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between ASRR.DE and AMED.DE?

ASRR.DE tracks MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi.