ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE).
ASRM.DE and H4ZL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASRM.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. It was launched on Dec 9, 2021. H4ZL.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011. Both ASRM.DE and H4ZL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -78.40% | -3.99% | -3.83% | 0.89% | -16.42% | -14.47% | 3.07% | -15.24% |
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD | 2.63% | -4.65% | 2.27% | 6.12% | -20.22% | 36.90% | -16.99% | 23.91% | -0.81% | -2.27% |
Returns By Period
ASRM.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
H4ZL.DE
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- 2.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASRM.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZL.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASRM.DE
H4ZL.DE
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASRM.DE | H4ZL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.28 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ASRM.DE and H4ZL.DE is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASRM.DE nor H4ZL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.63% | 3.62% | 2.19% | 3.13% | 2.95% | 3.29% | 3.08% | 2.96% | 2.67% |
Drawdowns
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASRM.DE | H4ZL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -41.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -16.80% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.77% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASRM.DE | H4ZL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.66% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.67% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.28% | — |