PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%-78.40%-3.99%-3.83%0.89%-16.42%-14.47%3.07%-15.24%
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
2.63%-4.65%2.27%6.12%-20.22%36.90%-16.99%23.91%-0.81%-2.27%

Returns By Period


ASRM.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

H4ZL.DE

1D
0.90%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
2.63%
6M
1.01%
1Y
-0.64%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRM.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZL.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRM.DE

H4ZL.DE
H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASRM.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

Correlation

The correlation between ASRM.DE and H4ZL.DE is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRM.DE nor H4ZL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.63%3.62%2.19%3.13%2.95%3.29%3.08%2.96%2.67%

Drawdowns

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRM.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

Volatility

ASRM.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASRM.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%