PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRD.DE achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than XQUA.DE's 4.67% return.


ASRD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.06%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
6.66%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*

XQUA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.31%
YTD
4.67%
6M
5.02%
1Y
9.87%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
1.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
1.12%11.16%3.52%6.69%-19.97%-1.25%
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
4.67%-1.36%5.24%3.95%-12.55%6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRD.DE and XQUA.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between ASRD.DE and XQUA.DE has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRD.DE
ASRD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XQUA.DE
XQUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASRD.DEXQUA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.42

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

7.35

-1.11

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRD.DE and XQUA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRD.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, which is greater than XQUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRD.DE and XQUA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRD.DEXQUA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-20.21%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-4.06%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-11.47%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-16.16%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-3.63%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-8.29%

-4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.34%

-0.02%

Volatility

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) at 1.23%. This indicates that ASRD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRD.DEXQUA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.23%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.00%

3.82%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.97%

6.22%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.05%

8.34%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.87%

8.83%

+0.04%

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XQUA.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASRD.DE vs. XQUA.DE - Dividend Comparison

ASRD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XQUA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
4.45%4.80%4.40%4.34%7.07%3.83%4.92%4.19%3.08%3.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRD.DE and XQUA.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUA.DE.

ASRD.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged), while XQUA.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ASRD.DE and 0.45% for XQUA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRD.DE and XQUA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer