PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRD.DE achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than EMIE.DE's -0.43% return.


ASRD.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.09%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*

EMIE.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
0.59%11.16%3.52%6.69%-19.97%0.96%
EMIE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.43%7.05%-0.36%3.88%-19.72%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRD.DE and EMIE.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.72

The correlation between ASRD.DE and EMIE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRD.DE
ASRD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIE.DE
EMIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASRD.DEEMIE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.12

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

3.63

+2.94

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRD.DE and EMIE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASRD.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.07

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.34

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.11

+0.10

Drawdowns

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRD.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, which is greater than EMIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRD.DE and EMIE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRD.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-26.98%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-3.53%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-6.97%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-25.83%

-3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.16%

-14.02%

+9.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-12.69%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.09%

+0.21%

Volatility

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) at 1.28%. This indicates that ASRD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRD.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

1.28%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.97%

2.83%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.97%

3.73%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.06%

6.67%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.96%

7.95%

+1.01%

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIE.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASRD.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRD.DE nor EMIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRD.DE and EMIE.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for EMIE.DE.

ASRD.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged), while EMIE.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets IG ESG Diversified Bond (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ASRD.DE and 0.43% for EMIE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRD.DE and EMIE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer