ASMU vs. TSLL
ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TSLL.
Performance
ASMU vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASMU
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 50.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- -22.80%
- 6M
- -25.74%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMU vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 30.81% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -12.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMU and TSLL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMU vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
ASMU
TSLL
ASMU vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMU | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | -0.08 | +1.57 |
Drawdowns
ASMU vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and TSLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMU | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -82.88% | +48.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -61.02% | +61.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -53.83% | +40.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.36% | — |
Volatility
ASMU vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMU | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.13% | 92.41% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 106.83% | -11.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 106.83% | -11.70% |
ASMU vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLL's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMU vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than TSLL's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 6.63% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMU and TSLL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 0.16% for ASMU.
Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.83% for TSLL.
Find the right allocation for ASMU and TSLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer