PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMU vs. NBIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASMU

1D
2.55%
1M
50.45%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIG

1D
-6.73%
1M
83.04%
YTD
453.13%
6M
273.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and NBIG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMU vs. NBIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMUNBIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

1.21

+0.28

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and NBIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMUNBIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-75.83%

+41.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.57%

+9.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-43.08%

+29.56%

Volatility

ASMU vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMUNBIGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.13%

201.21%

-106.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.13%

201.21%

-106.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.13%

201.21%

-106.08%

ASMU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASMU and NBIG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.

ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.75% for NBIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMU and NBIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer