ASMOX vs. QISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund (ASMOX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX).
ASMOX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 9, 2009. QISGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
ASMOX vs. QISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASMOX vs. QISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMOX AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund | 1.25% | 16.87% | 16.54% | 18.37% | -19.56% | 15.37% | 25.76% | 26.47% | -12.14% | 17.43% |
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | -3.30% | 17.72% | 15.63% | 19.63% | -27.94% | 18.14% | 29.91% | 21.14% | -6.33% | 25.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASMOX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly higher than QISGX's -3.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ASMOX having a 11.41% annualized return and QISGX not far ahead at 11.53%.
ASMOX
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
QISGX
- 1D
- 4.16%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASMOX vs. QISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMOX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than QISGX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASMOX vs. QISGX — Risk / Return Rank
ASMOX
QISGX
ASMOX vs. QISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund (ASMOX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASMOX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.90 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.84 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 6.52 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMOX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.19 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.47 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.35 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMOX and QISGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ASMOX vs. QISGX - Dividend Comparison
ASMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than QISGX's 4.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMOX AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund | 8.02% | 8.12% | 18.80% | 3.92% | 0.57% | 24.81% | 5.46% | 4.38% | 29.63% | 9.90% | 0.79% | 1.23% |
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 4.05% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 3.63% | 29.34% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 7.03% | 5.09% | 1.61% | 18.51% |
Drawdowns
ASMOX vs. QISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMOX drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum QISGX drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMOX and QISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMOX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -60.75% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -13.23% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -38.60% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.16% | -45.08% | +2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -9.62% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.63% | -13.99% | +3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 3.73% | +0.84% |
Volatility
ASMOX vs. QISGX - Volatility Comparison
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund (ASMOX) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) at 8.17%. This indicates that ASMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASMOX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 8.17% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.35% | 16.54% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.96% | 22.52% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.04% | 24.48% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 24.65% | +1.84% |