ASMIY vs. TCLHF
ASMIY (ASM International NV ADR) and TCLHF (TCL Electronics Holdings Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ASMIY in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, TCLHF in Consumer Electronics. Over the past 10 years, ASMIY returned 41.44%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for TCLHF. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASMIY achieves a 71.95% return, which is significantly higher than TCLHF's 30.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ASMIY has outperformed TCLHF with an annualized return of 41.44%, while TCLHF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.45% annualized return.
ASMIY
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- 6M
- 42.76%
- YTD
- 71.95%
- 1Y
- 69.26%
- 3Y*
- 36.66%
- 5Y*
- 26.44%
- 10Y*
- 41.44%
TCLHF
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- YTD
- 30.78%
- 1Y
- 33.18%
- 3Y*
- 58.05%
- 5Y*
- 28.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMIY ASM International NV ADR | 71.95% | 6.62% | 10.11% | 105.57% | -42.49% | 109.33% | 94.36% | 196.39% | -36.06% | 55.48% |
TCLHF TCL Electronics Holdings Limited | 30.78% | 74.10% | 167.22% | -19.67% | -21.86% | -32.28% | 71.60% | 28.57% | -21.02% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMIY and TCLHF is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
ASMIY:
$50.63B
TCLHF:
$4.46B
ASMIY:
€20.13
TCLHF:
HK$1.19
ASMIY:
44.96
TCLHF:
11.68
ASMIY:
2.88
TCLHF:
0.26
ASMIY:
13.94
TCLHF:
0.24
ASMIY:
10.37
TCLHF:
1.77
ASMIY:
€3.19B
TCLHF:
HK$146.31B
ASMIY:
€1.65B
TCLHF:
HK$23.20B
ASMIY:
€1.41B
TCLHF:
HK$4.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMIY vs. TCLHF — Risk / Return Rank
ASMIY
TCLHF
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) and TCL Electronics Holdings Limited (TCLHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASMIY | TCLHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.44 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 3.20 | +3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMIY drawdown since its inception was -58.10%, smaller than the maximum TCLHF drawdown of -92.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMIY and TCLHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMIY | TCLHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.10% | -92.31% | +34.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.07% | -28.67% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.17% | -43.26% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.10% | -54.15% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.10% | -69.25% | +11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.86% | -15.73% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.69% | -43.55% | +27.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.36% | 12.93% | -2.57% |
Volatility
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) is 21.77%, while TCL Electronics Holdings Limited (TCLHF) has a volatility of 28.64%. This indicates that ASMIY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCLHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMIY | TCLHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.77% | 28.64% | -6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.46% | 65.95% | -28.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.19% | 97.26% | -49.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.33% | 76.43% | -29.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.19% | 67.39% | -24.20% |
Dividends
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Dividend Comparison
ASMIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than TCLHF's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMIY ASM International NV ADR | 0.37% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.52% | 1.08% | 0.54% | 0.85% | 1.83% | 14.04% | 0.99% | 1.52% |
TCLHF TCL Electronics Holdings Limited | 0.46% | 3.02% | 2.48% | 5.16% | 0.00% | 2.94% | 3.51% | 5.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASM International NV ADR and TCL Electronics Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASMIY vs. TCLHF - Profitability Comparison
ASMIY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a gross profit of 459.90M and revenue of 862.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.
TCLHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 29.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.2%.
ASMIY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported an operating income of 278.20M and revenue of 862.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
TCLHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 372.86M and revenue of 29.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
ASMIY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a net income of 238.50M and revenue of 862.50M, resulting in a net margin of 27.7%.
TCLHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited reported a net income of 359.34M and revenue of 29.23B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMIY and TCLHF have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCLHF has higher volatility (28.64%) compared to ASMIY (21.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMIY dropped -58.10% vs TCLHF's -92.31%.
ASMIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASMIY and TCLHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer