PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMIY vs. PLAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMIY achieves a 53.34% return, which is significantly higher than PLAB's -5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ASMIY has outperformed PLAB with an annualized return of 40.58%, while PLAB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.


ASMIY

1D
0.77%
1M
-12.21%
6M
10.64%
YTD
53.34%
1Y
92.05%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
21.32%
10Y*
40.58%
ALL TIME*
37.89%

PLAB

1D
2.40%
1M
4.95%
6M
-12.38%
YTD
-5.34%
1Y
53.06%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
17.77%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
6.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.57M$23.48M$12.47M
$27.43M$30.47M$52.12M

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASMIY
ASM International NV ADR
53.34%6.62%10.11%105.57%-42.49%109.33%94.36%196.39%-36.06%55.48%
PLAB
Photronics, Inc.
-5.34%35.82%-24.90%86.39%-10.72%68.91%-29.19%62.81%13.55%-24.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMIY and PLAB is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.41

Over the past year, ASMIY and PLAB have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASMIY:

$45.16B

PLAB:

$1.79B

EPS

ASMIY:

€21.82

PLAB:

$2.70

PE Ratio

ASMIY:

36.65

PLAB:

11.21

PEG Ratio

ASMIY:

2.35

PLAB:

0.34

PS Ratio

ASMIY:

11.70

PLAB:

2.07

PB Ratio

ASMIY:

8.84

PLAB:

1.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASMIY:

€3.36B

PLAB:

$861.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASMIY:

€1.74B

PLAB:

$290.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASMIY:

€1.46B

PLAB:

$268.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMIY vs. PLAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASMIY
ASMIY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ASMIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMIY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMIY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PLAB
PLAB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PLAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLAB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PLAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLAB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMIYPLABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

0.98

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

2.34

+8.26

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMIY Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the PLAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMIY and PLAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMIY drawdown since its inception was -58.10%, smaller than the maximum PLAB drawdown of -99.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMIY and PLAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMIYPLABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.10%

-99.22%

+41.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.46%

-49.87%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.17%

-50.62%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.10%

-50.62%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.10%

-50.62%

-7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.86%

-44.89%

+19.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-56.32%

+40.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.63%

20.87%

-12.24%

Volatility

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Volatility Comparison

ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) has a higher volatility of 21.48% compared to Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) at 16.34%. This indicates that ASMIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMIYPLABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.48%

16.34%

+5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.90%

66.21%

-26.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.58%

84.39%

-33.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.94%

58.51%

-10.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.49%

51.41%

-7.92%

Dividends

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Dividend Comparison

ASMIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while PLAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ASMIY
ASM International NV ADR
0.41%0.52%0.53%0.52%1.08%0.54%0.85%1.83%14.04%0.99%1.52%
PLAB
Photronics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASM International NV ADR and Photronics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ASM International NV ADR and Photronics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ASMIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a gross profit of 521.10M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

PLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 65.76M and revenue of 209.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

ASMIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported an operating income of 322.80M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.2%.

PLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported an operating income of -54.80M and revenue of 209.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -26.1%.

ASMIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a net income of 285.40M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 28.5%.

PLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported a net income of 31.43M and revenue of 209.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASMIY and PLAB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMIY has higher volatility (21.48%) compared to PLAB (16.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMIY dropped -58.10% vs PLAB's -99.22%.

ASMIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMIY and PLAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer