ASMIY vs. PLAB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB).

Performance

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASMIY ASM International NV ADR	24.93%	6.62%	10.11%	105.57%	-42.49%	109.33%	94.36%	196.39%	-36.06%	55.48%
PLAB Photronics, Inc.	26.28%	35.82%	-24.90%	86.39%	-10.72%	68.91%	-29.19%	62.81%	13.55%	-24.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ASMIY : $37.02B PLAB : $2.36B
EPS ASMIY : $14.66 PLAB : $2.29
PE Ratio ASMIY : 51.42 PLAB : 17.61
PEG Ratio ASMIY : 3.29 PLAB : 0.53
PS Ratio ASMIY : 11.72 PLAB : 2.79
PB Ratio ASMIY : 9.25 PLAB : 1.43
Total Revenue (TTM) ASMIY : $3.16B PLAB : $862.22M
Gross Profit (TTM) ASMIY : $1.64B PLAB : $303.00M
EBITDA (TTM) ASMIY : $1.40B PLAB : $295.73M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMIY achieves a 24.93% return, which is significantly lower than PLAB's 26.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ASMIY has outperformed PLAB with an annualized return of 35.23%, while PLAB has yielded a comparatively lower 14.37% annualized return.

ASMIY

• 1D: 5.32%
• 1M: -10.98%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.44%
• 1Y: 66.55%
• 3Y*: 23.92%
• 5Y*: 20.43%
• 10Y*: 35.23%

PLAB

• 1D: 9.28%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 26.28%
• 6M: 76.08%
• 1Y: 94.65%
• 3Y*: 34.58%
• 5Y*: 25.33%
• 10Y*: 14.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ASMIY vs. PLAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMIY

ASMIY Risk / Return Rank: 80
ASMIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ASMIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ASMIY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ASMIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ASMIY Martin Ratio Rank: 79

PLAB

PLAB Risk / Return Rank: 85
PLAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PLAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PLAB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PLAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PLAB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASMIY	PLAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.27	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.28	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.89	-1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	9.03	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMIY Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the PLAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMIY and PLAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMIY	PLAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.27	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.47	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.29	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.12	+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between ASMIY and PLAB is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Dividend Comparison

ASMIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while PLAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ASMIY ASM International NV ADR	0.41%	0.52%	0.53%	0.52%	1.08%	0.54%	0.85%	1.83%	14.04%	0.99%	1.52%
PLAB Photronics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMIY drawdown since its inception was -58.10%, smaller than the maximum PLAB drawdown of -99.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMIY and PLAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMIY	PLAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.10%	-99.22%	+41.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.14%	-24.72%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.10%	-50.62%	-7.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.10%	-50.62%	-7.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.85%	-10.46%	-3.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.00%	-56.61%	+40.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.08%	10.65%	+0.43%

Volatility

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) is 17.40%, while Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) has a volatility of 24.60%. This indicates that ASMIY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASMIY	PLAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.40%	24.60%	-7.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.53%	59.79%	-26.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.93%	74.70%	-26.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.47%	54.69%	-8.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.87%	49.08%	-6.21%

Financials

ASMIY vs. PLAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ASM International NV ADR and Photronics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ASMIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a gross profit of 344.44M and revenue of 691.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

PLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.70M and revenue of 225.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.

ASMIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported an operating income of 174.94M and revenue of 691.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

PLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 54.86M and revenue of 225.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

ASMIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a net income of 164.44M and revenue of 691.75M, resulting in a net margin of 23.8%.

PLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported a net income of 42.94M and revenue of 225.07M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.