ASMF vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ASMF (Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - ASMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Virtus, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). ASMF is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, ASMF returned 16.81% vs 35.19% for YCS. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASMF charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

ASMF vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMF achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 6.99% return.

ASMF

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 11.65%
• 1Y: 16.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 8.81%
• 1Y: 35.19%
• 3Y*: 19.77%
• 5Y*: 23.16%
• 10Y*: 12.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMF vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ASMF Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF	9.38%	1.16%	-3.56%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	6.99%	9.04%	6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMF and YCS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024	0.01

Return for Risk

ASMF vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMF

ASMF Risk / Return Rank: 50
ASMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ASMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ASMF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ASMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ASMF Martin Ratio Rank: 53

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 63
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMF vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASMF	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.05	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.59	-0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	3.95	-0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	12.35	-3.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASMF vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMF and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMF	YCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.05	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.33	-0.03

Drawdowns

ASMF vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMF drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMF and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMF	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-49.56%	+34.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.02%	-8.30%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-0.04%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-19.94%	+12.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	2.66%	-0.76%

Volatility

ASMF vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) is 2.60%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that ASMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASMF	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	2.75%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	12.36%	-3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	17.38%	-6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.98%	21.11%	-10.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.98%	19.02%	-8.04%

ASMF vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMF vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

ASMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ASMF Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF	0.20%	0.22%	1.66%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMF and YCS in my portfolio?

ASMF and YCS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASMF or YCS?

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to ASMF (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMF dropped -15.31% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, ASMF or YCS?

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 35.19% vs 16.81% for ASMF. On fees, ASMF is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, ASMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASMF or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 35.19% return vs 16.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMF or YCS?

ASMF is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMF or YCS?

ASMF has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between ASMF and YCS?

ASMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ASMF and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.