PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMF vs. VEMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMF vs. VEMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMF achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than VEMY's 5.89% return.


ASMF

1D
0.01%
1M
1.73%
YTD
9.39%
6M
11.45%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VEMY

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.89%
6M
6.65%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMF vs. VEMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMF and VEMY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMF vs. VEMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMF
ASMF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ASMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMF vs. VEMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASMFVEMYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

3.09

-1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

4.75

-2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.63

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

4.67

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.07

22.18

-13.11

ASMF vs. VEMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the VEMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMF and VEMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMFVEMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

3.09

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.83

-1.53

Drawdowns

ASMF vs. VEMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMF drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than VEMY's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMF and VEMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMFVEMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-8.77%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-4.00%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.17%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-1.30%

-6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.84%

+1.06%

Volatility

ASMF vs. VEMY - Volatility Comparison

Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) at 1.60%. This indicates that ASMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMFVEMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

1.60%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

4.65%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

6.05%

+5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.97%

7.63%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.97%

7.63%

+3.34%

ASMF vs. VEMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMF vs. VEMY - Dividend Comparison

ASMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than VEMY's 8.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
0.20%0.22%1.66%0.00%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.38%8.89%10.28%9.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASMF and VEMY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMF has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to VEMY (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMF dropped -15.31% vs VEMY's -8.77%.

On 1-year performance, VEMY leads with 18.61% vs 17.16% for ASMF. On fees, VEMY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VEMY has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 17.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEMY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ASMF.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.38%, compared with 0.20% for ASMF.

ASMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while VEMY is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ASMF and 0.58% for VEMY.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMF and VEMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer