ASMF vs. SOFR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ASMF (Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF) and SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Virtus, while SOFR is a Multisector Bonds fund tracking the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. ASMF is actively managed, while SOFR is passively managed. Over the past year, ASMF returned 16.81% vs 3.93% for SOFR. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. ASMF charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SOFR.

Performance

ASMF vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMF achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly higher than SOFR's 1.45% return.

ASMF

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 11.65%
• 1Y: 16.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOFR

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMF vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ASMF Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF	9.38%	1.16%	-3.83%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	1.45%	4.27%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMF and SOFR is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

ASMF vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMF

ASMF Risk / Return Rank: 50
ASMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ASMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ASMF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ASMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ASMF Martin Ratio Rank: 53

SOFR

SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 97
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMF vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASMF	SOFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	4.69	-3.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	6.91	-4.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	3.37	-2.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	9.70	-6.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	40.33	-31.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASMF vs. SOFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the SOFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMF and SOFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMF	SOFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	4.69	-3.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	4.96	-4.67

Drawdowns

ASMF vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMF drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMF and SOFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMF	SOFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-0.41%	-14.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.02%	-0.41%	-4.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-0.15%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-0.03%	-7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	0.10%	+1.80%

Volatility

ASMF vs. SOFR - Volatility Comparison

Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) at 0.24%. This indicates that ASMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASMF	SOFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	0.24%	+2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	0.55%	+8.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	0.84%	+10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.98%	0.84%	+10.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.98%	0.84%	+10.14%

ASMF vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMF vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

ASMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SOFR's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ASMF Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF	0.20%	0.22%	1.66%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	3.95%	4.22%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMF and SOFR in my portfolio?

ASMF and SOFR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASMF or SOFR?

ASMF has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to SOFR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMF dropped -15.31% vs SOFR's -0.41%.

Which ETF is better, ASMF or SOFR?

On 1-year performance, ASMF leads with 16.81% vs 3.93% for SOFR. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASMF or SOFR?

Over the 1-year period, ASMF has performed better with a 16.81% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMF or SOFR?

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ASMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMF or SOFR?

SOFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.20% for ASMF.

What is the main difference between ASMF and SOFR?

ASMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while SOFR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ASMF and 0.20% for SOFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.69 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.