ASM vs. PLTR
ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ASM returned 38.35%/yr vs 34.48%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASM achieves a -5.31% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -34.35% return.
ASM
- 1D
- -8.41%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -5.31%
- 6M
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- 69.94%
- 3Y*
- 107.69%
- 5Y*
- 38.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- -34.35%
- 6M
- -39.89%
- 1Y
- -16.60%
- 3Y*
- 102.61%
- 5Y*
- 34.48%
- 10Y*
- —
ASM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -5.31% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 25.00% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -34.35% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASM and PLTR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
ASM:
$1.02B
PLTR:
$300.03B
ASM:
$0.23
PLTR:
$0.89
ASM:
25.88
PLTR:
131.32
ASM:
0.08
PLTR:
0.76
ASM:
8.62
PLTR:
57.35
ASM:
3.70
PLTR:
35.51
ASM:
$110.70M
PLTR:
$5.22B
ASM:
$59.09M
PLTR:
$4.39B
ASM:
$55.20M
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
ASM
PLTR
ASM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.98 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | -0.38 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | -0.75 | +3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASM drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.10% | -84.62% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.40% | -43.67% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.40% | -43.67% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.94% | -79.14% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.69% | -43.67% | -4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.74% | -40.26% | -23.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.37% | 22.06% | +3.31% |
Volatility
ASM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a higher volatility of 27.33% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 19.16%. This indicates that ASM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASM | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.33% | 19.16% | +8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.16% | 38.60% | +27.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.61% | 51.49% | +31.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.18% | 65.59% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.80% | 69.73% | +0.07% |
Dividends
ASM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASM nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ASM vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASM vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (27.33%) compared to PLTR (19.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASM dropped -94.10% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASM and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer