ASLV vs. LSVD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASLV (Allspring Special Large Value ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ASLV returned 16.78% vs 43.26% for LSVD. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASLV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.

Performance

ASLV vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASLV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 17.67% return.

ASLV

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 16.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSVD

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 17.67%
• 6M: 18.95%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASLV vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASLV Allspring Special Large Value ETF	4.75%	14.10%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	17.67%	26.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ASLV and LSVD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.78

The correlation between ASLV and LSVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASLV vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASLV

ASLV Risk / Return Rank: 41
ASLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ASLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
ASLV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ASLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ASLV Martin Ratio Rank: 43

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 92
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASLV vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASLV	LSVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	3.41	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	4.64	-2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.61	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	5.38	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.83	24.69	-17.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASLV vs. LSVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the LSVD Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASLV and LSVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASLV	LSVD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	3.41	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	1.66	-0.58

Drawdowns

ASLV vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASLV drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASLV and LSVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASLV	LSVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.98%	-19.30%	+8.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.69%	-8.07%	-0.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-0.53%	-1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-2.47%	+0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	1.76%	+0.70%

Volatility

ASLV vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) is 3.14%, while LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that ASLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASLV	LSVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	3.36%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.26%	9.52%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.83%	12.76%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.26%	17.45%	-2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.26%	17.45%	-2.19%

ASLV vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASLV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASLV vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison

ASLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASLV Allspring Special Large Value ETF	0.83%	0.87%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.27%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASLV and LSVD in my portfolio?

ASLV and LSVD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASLV or LSVD?

LSVD has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to ASLV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASLV dropped -10.98% vs LSVD's -19.30%.

Which ETF is better, ASLV or LSVD?

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 16.78% for ASLV. On fees, ASLV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ASLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASLV or LSVD?

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 16.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASLV or LSVD?

ASLV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASLV or LSVD?

ASLV has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between ASLV and LSVD?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ASLV and 0.40% for LSVD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.