PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASILX vs. BGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASILX vs. BGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio (ASILX) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASILX achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than BGX's -3.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ASILX has outperformed BGX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while BGX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.44% annualized return.


ASILX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.20%
YTD
4.34%
6M
4.06%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
9.25%

BGX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-3.03%
1Y
-2.58%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASILX vs. BGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASILX
AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio
4.34%9.77%18.46%11.06%-9.94%17.81%10.23%17.17%-1.61%12.61%
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
-3.88%2.09%19.83%18.92%-20.57%17.54%-5.67%24.98%-4.19%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ASILX and BGX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASILX vs. BGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASILX
ASILX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ASILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ASILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BGX
BGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASILX vs. BGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio (ASILX) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASILXBGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.95

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

-0.21

+3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

-0.42

+14.06

ASILX vs. BGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the BGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASILX and BGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASILX vs. BGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASILX drawdown since its inception was -18.36%, smaller than the maximum BGX drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASILX and BGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASILXBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.36%

-47.40%

+29.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-12.43%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.94%

-14.08%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.30%

-25.94%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.36%

-47.40%

+29.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-7.56%

+6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-6.99%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

6.16%

-5.22%

Volatility

ASILX vs. BGX - Volatility Comparison

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio (ASILX) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) at 0.96%. This indicates that ASILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASILXBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

0.96%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

5.90%

-2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

7.94%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.98%

11.77%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

17.53%

-8.23%

ASILX vs. BGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASILX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BGX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASILX vs. BGX - Dividend Comparison

ASILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.60%, more than BGX's 9.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASILX
AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio
12.60%13.15%7.18%1.41%6.51%11.92%4.28%3.54%8.71%5.03%0.00%3.35%
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
9.05%8.87%9.89%11.71%8.15%7.01%8.76%9.35%11.74%7.12%9.01%8.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASILX and BGX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASILX has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to BGX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASILX dropped -18.36% vs BGX's -47.40%.

ASILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASILX and BGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer