PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHX vs. YANG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHX vs. YANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YANG

1D
-1.11%
1M
16.15%
YTD
38.80%
6M
42.75%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
-44.66%
5Y*
-32.29%
10Y*
-38.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHX vs. YANG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%-13.59%-26.45%2.64%42.24%35.03%-27.51%20.14%
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares
38.80%-62.77%-71.41%11.95%-41.34%25.90%-58.66%-40.72%13.14%-64.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHX and YANG is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2015

-0.55

The correlation between ASHX and YANG shifts across timeframes, from -0.55 (10 years) to -0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHX vs. YANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


YANG
YANG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
YANG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
YANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YANG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHX vs. YANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASHXYANGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.22

ASHX vs. YANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASHX vs. YANG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHXYANGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.39%

Volatility

ASHX vs. YANG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHXYANGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.10%

ASHX vs. YANG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than YANG's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHX vs. YANG - Dividend Comparison

ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares
2.94%4.03%9.42%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.67%1.54%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHX and YANG have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.

YANG has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.

ASHX is categorized as China Equities, while YANG is Leveraged Equities. ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 1.07% for YANG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHX and YANG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer