ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Ashmore Group plc (ASHM.L) and Abrdn plc (ABDN.L).
Performance
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHM.L Ashmore Group plc | 29.35% | 21.77% | -21.81% | 2.03% | -11.07% | -29.28% | -13.14% | 46.98% | -5.47% | 49.79% |
ABDN.L Abrdn plc | -0.13% | 57.94% | -12.84% | 2.11% | -14.88% | -9.77% | -5.36% | 38.83% | -37.07% | 23.74% |
Fundamentals
ASHM.L:
£0.27
ABDN.L:
£0.70
ASHM.L:
8.25
ABDN.L:
2.84
ASHM.L:
4.85
ABDN.L:
0.56
ASHM.L:
£316.50M
ABDN.L:
£3.20B
ASHM.L:
£197.30M
ABDN.L:
£3.05B
ASHM.L:
£164.30M
ABDN.L:
£796.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHM.L achieves a 29.35% return, which is significantly higher than ABDN.L's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHM.L has outperformed ABDN.L with an annualized return of 4.02%, while ABDN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.
ASHM.L
- 1D
- 5.87%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 37.34%
- 1Y
- 63.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
ABDN.L
- 1D
- 4.37%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- 37.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ASHM.L
ABDN.L
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Group plc (ASHM.L) and Abrdn plc (ABDN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHM.L | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.18 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.65 | 1.64 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.53 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 7.75 | +0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHM.L | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.18 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.02 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.06 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.14 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHM.L and ABDN.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L - Dividend Comparison
ASHM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than ABDN.L's 7.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHM.L Ashmore Group plc | 7.55% | 9.58% | 10.57% | 7.59% | 7.06% | 5.81% | 3.92% | 3.21% | 4.55% | 4.11% | 5.89% | 6.49% |
ABDN.L Abrdn plc | 7.37% | 7.10% | 10.34% | 8.17% | 7.71% | 6.06% | 7.68% | 6.58% | 22.85% | 4.66% | 5.06% | 17.89% |
Drawdowns
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHM.L drawdown since its inception was -68.02%, which is greater than ABDN.L's maximum drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHM.L and ABDN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHM.L | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.02% | -59.88% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.26% | -18.94% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.67% | -50.49% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.02% | -56.34% | -11.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.62% | -12.79% | -24.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -23.14% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.82% | 5.11% | +2.71% |
Volatility
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L - Volatility Comparison
Ashmore Group plc (ASHM.L) has a higher volatility of 13.24% compared to Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) at 11.24%. This indicates that ASHM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABDN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASHM.L | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.24% | 11.24% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.37% | 22.15% | +9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.75% | 31.46% | +7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.98% | 32.21% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 34.00% | -1.62% |
Financials
ASHM.L vs. ABDN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashmore Group plc and Abrdn plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities