PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHM.L vs. OCN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ashmore Group plc (ASHM.L) and Ocean Wilsons Holdings Ltd (OCN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHM.L
Ashmore Group plc
29.35%21.77%-21.81%2.03%-11.07%-29.28%-13.14%46.98%-5.47%49.79%
OCN.L
Ocean Wilsons Holdings Ltd
0.00%-0.20%13.56%37.53%5.75%16.21%-7.39%-11.25%11.88%18.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASHM.L:

£1.53B

OCN.L:

£417.28M

EPS

ASHM.L:

£0.27

OCN.L:

£10.91

PE Ratio

ASHM.L:

8.25

OCN.L:

1.08

PS Ratio

ASHM.L:

4.85

OCN.L:

1.50

PB Ratio

ASHM.L:

1.98

OCN.L:

0.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASHM.L:

£316.50M

OCN.L:

£277.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASHM.L:

£197.30M

OCN.L:

£181.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASHM.L:

£164.30M

OCN.L:

£110.01M

Returns By Period


ASHM.L

1D
5.87%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
29.35%
6M
37.34%
1Y
63.25%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
-3.25%
10Y*
4.02%

OCN.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ashmore Group plc

Ocean Wilsons Holdings Ltd

Often compared with ASHM.L:
ASHM.L vs. EMG.LASHM.L vs. ABDN.L

Return for Risk

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHM.L
ASHM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ASHM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

OCN.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Group plc (ASHM.L) and Ocean Wilsons Holdings Ltd (OCN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASHM.LOCN.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.66

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASHM.LOCN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ASHM.L and OCN.L is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Dividend Comparison

ASHM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, less than OCN.L's 11.40% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHM.L
Ashmore Group plc
7.55%9.58%10.57%7.59%7.06%5.81%3.92%3.21%4.55%4.11%5.89%6.49%
OCN.L
Ocean Wilsons Holdings Ltd
11.40%11.40%5.15%4.69%6.03%5.33%6.44%5.44%4.42%10.22%10.43%13.57%

Drawdowns

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHM.LOCN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

Volatility

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASHM.LOCN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.38%

Financials

ASHM.L vs. OCN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashmore Group plc and Ocean Wilsons Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
79.60M
0
(ASHM.L) Total Revenue
(OCN.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items