ASGM vs. TACK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) and TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASGM charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for TACK.

Performance

ASGM vs. TACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASGM achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than TACK's 5.30% return.

ASGM

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: 17.56%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TACK

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 4.38%
• 1Y: 13.21%
• 3Y*: 11.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASGM vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF	17.56%	11.08%
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	5.30%	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ASGM and TACK is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

ASGM vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASGM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TACK

TACK Risk / Return Rank: 43
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 37
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASGM vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASGM	TACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.38	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.97	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.27	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.08	—

Drawdowns

ASGM vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASGM drawdown since its inception was -6.62%, smaller than the maximum TACK drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGM and TACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASGM	TACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-14.49%	+7.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.85%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-0.82%	-3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-4.19%	+2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASGM	TACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	9.68%	+7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.01%	11.23%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.01%	11.23%	+5.78%

ASGM vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASGM has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASGM vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison

ASGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than TACK's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF	3.84%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	1.21%	1.18%	1.26%	1.29%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASGM and TACK in my portfolio?

ASGM and TACK have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASGM or TACK?

On fees, TACK is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASGM or TACK?

TACK is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASGM or TACK?

ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.21% for TACK.

What is the main difference between ASGM and TACK?

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Fairlead. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for ASGM and 0.76% for TACK.