ASGI vs. LGI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASGI (Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund) and LGI (Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund) are both mutual funds - ASGI is a Industrials Equities fund managed by Aberdeen, while LGI is a Global Allocation fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 5 years, ASGI returned 10.77%/yr vs 6.89%/yr for LGI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASGI charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for LGI.

Performance

ASGI vs. LGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASGI achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly lower than LGI's 8.63% return.

ASGI

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 28.21%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

LGI

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 23.21%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASGI vs. LGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund	5.26%	44.20%	10.26%	14.48%	-10.50%	18.17%	-0.47%
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	8.63%	21.36%	14.00%	12.89%	-20.57%	25.28%	24.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ASGI and LGI is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020	0.41

The correlation between ASGI and LGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ASGI vs. LGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASGI

ASGI Risk / Return Rank: 27
ASGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ASGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ASGI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ASGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ASGI Martin Ratio Rank: 28

LGI

LGI Risk / Return Rank: 20
LGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
LGI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LGI Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASGI vs. LGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASGI	LGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.44	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	1.93	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	1.10	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	4.03	+2.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASGI vs. LGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the LGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASGI and LGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASGI	LGI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	1.44	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.36	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.39	+0.34

Drawdowns

ASGI vs. LGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASGI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum LGI drawdown of -63.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGI and LGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASGI	LGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.71%	-63.34%	+39.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.15%	-21.25%	+6.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.24%	-21.95%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.71%	-32.84%	+9.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.05%	-6.13%	-2.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-10.95%	+5.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	5.77%	-1.58%

Volatility

ASGI vs. LGI - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) at 3.81%. This indicates that ASGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASGI	LGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	3.81%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.45%	14.22%	+2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.52%	16.16%	+2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	19.29%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	20.11%	-2.74%

ASGI vs. LGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASGI has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LGI's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASGI vs. LGI - Dividend Comparison

ASGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than LGI's 9.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund	11.54%	10.96%	12.84%	8.03%	8.25%	6.33%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	9.88%	10.08%	9.19%	7.32%	10.22%	9.77%	7.17%	6.44%	19.88%	5.46%	6.94%	8.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASGI and LGI in my portfolio?

ASGI and LGI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASGI or LGI?

ASGI has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to LGI (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASGI dropped -23.71% vs LGI's -63.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.