ASG vs. BTO
ASG (Liberty All-Star Growth) is a stock, while BTO (John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, ASG returned 11.85%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for BTO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASG charges 1.11%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for BTO.
Performance
ASG vs. BTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASG achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than BTO's 12.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ASG having a 11.85% annualized return and BTO not far behind at 11.66%.
ASG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 4.45%
- 1Y
- 9.56%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- -1.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
BTO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 21.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
ASG vs. BTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASG Liberty All-Star Growth | 4.45% | 2.21% | 16.78% | 16.23% | -40.91% | 22.60% | 37.99% | 60.54% | -14.35% | 44.64% |
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 12.01% | 5.85% | 28.92% | -1.16% | -23.58% | 61.86% | -8.97% | 38.87% | -25.68% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASG and BTO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1994 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASG vs. BTO — Risk / Return Rank
ASG
BTO
ASG vs. BTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASG | BTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 1.23 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 3.05 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASG vs. BTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASG drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, smaller than the maximum BTO drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASG and BTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASG | BTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.77% | -72.27% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.77% | -15.26% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.25% | -25.19% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.91% | -51.80% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.91% | -65.70% | +19.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.82% | -1.10% | -17.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -18.99% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 6.16% | -1.92% |
Volatility
ASG vs. BTO - Volatility Comparison
Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) at 5.35%. This indicates that ASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASG | BTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 5.35% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | 14.89% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 20.71% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 31.21% | -8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 36.12% | -11.04% |
ASG vs. BTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASG has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than BTO's 2.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASG vs. BTO - Dividend Comparison
ASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than BTO's 6.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASG Liberty All-Star Growth | 8.87% | 8.68% | 8.32% | 8.14% | 10.14% | 11.33% | 7.68% | 7.08% | 10.48% | 7.58% | 8.61% | 16.81% |
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 6.86% | 7.41% | 7.28% | 8.64% | 7.51% | 4.72% | 7.25% | 6.06% | 5.94% | 3.76% | 5.10% | 4.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASG and BTO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to BTO (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASG dropped -66.77% vs BTO's -72.27%.
BTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASG and BTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer