PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASET vs. RULE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASET vs. RULE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RULE

1D
2.91%
1M
20.61%
YTD
44.43%
6M
45.11%
1Y
51.95%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. RULE - Yearly Performance Comparison


ASET vs. RULE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASET
RULE

Real Estate

41.6%
0.0%

Industrials

16.3%
13.2%

Utilities

12.8%
0.0%

Communication Services

12.1%
5.0%

Energy

7.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

5.8%
9.0%

Healthcare

2.2%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
0.8%

Technology

0.2%
54.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
3.2%

Financial Services

-

5.7%

Real Estate

ASET
41.6%
RULE
0.0%

Industrials

ASET
16.3%
RULE
13.2%

Utilities

ASET
12.8%
RULE
0.0%

Communication Services

ASET
12.1%
RULE
5.0%

Energy

ASET
7.8%
RULE
2.4%

Basic Materials

ASET
5.8%
RULE
9.0%

Healthcare

ASET
2.2%
RULE
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

ASET
1.1%
RULE
0.8%

Technology

ASET
0.2%
RULE
54.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ASET
0.1%
RULE
3.2%

Financial Services

ASET

-

RULE
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASET vs. RULE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

RULE
RULE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. RULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASET vs. RULE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASETRULEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

ASET vs. RULE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum RULE drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and RULE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASETRULEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-30.48%

+30.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-14.99%

+14.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

Volatility

ASET vs. RULE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASETRULEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

20.25%

-20.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

14.83%

-14.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

14.83%

-14.83%

ASET vs. RULE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than RULE's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASET vs. RULE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASET nor RULE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for RULE.

ASET and RULE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 1.10% for RULE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASET and RULE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer