ASET vs. RAA
ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) and RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. ASET is passively managed, while RAA is actively managed. ASET charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RAA.
Performance
ASET vs. RAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAA
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASET vs. RAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% |
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF | 8.32% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASET vs. RAA — Risk / Return Rank
ASET
RAA
ASET vs. RAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASET | RAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.53 | — |
Drawdowns
ASET vs. RAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum RAA drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and RAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASET | RAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -11.80% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.41% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.46% | — |
Volatility
ASET vs. RAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASET | RAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 9.48% | -9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 12.72% | -12.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 12.72% | -12.72% |
ASET vs. RAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than RAA's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASET vs. RAA - Dividend Comparison
ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF | 2.10% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RAA.
RAA has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and SMI Advisory Services. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.85% for RAA.
Find the right allocation for ASET and RAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer