ASET vs. PTIN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return while PTIN tracks the Pacer Trendpilot International Index. Both are passively managed. ASET charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.

Performance

ASET vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PTIN

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 9.19%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 1Y: 32.43%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 6.71%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	$300.58K	$334.58K	$457.99K

ASET vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	9.88%

Return for Risk

ASET vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PTIN

PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 79
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASET vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASET	PTIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.83	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.51	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.80	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.30	—

Drawdowns

ASET vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PTIN drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and PTIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASET	PTIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-21.27%	+21.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.55%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.02%	+2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-7.56%	+7.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASET	PTIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	17.72%	-17.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	14.74%	-14.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	14.12%	-14.12%

ASET vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASET vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	2.18%	2.53%	2.67%	2.09%	0.41%	2.38%	0.77%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASET or PTIN?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASET or PTIN?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASET or PTIN?

PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between ASET and PTIN?

ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return, while PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.66% for PTIN.