PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASET vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASET vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFUL

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.45%
YTD
3.28%
6M
3.33%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


ASET vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASET
MFUL

Real Estate

41.6%
2.4%

Industrials

16.3%
9.9%

Utilities

12.8%
5.5%

Communication Services

12.1%
8.4%

Energy

7.8%
8.0%

Basic Materials

5.8%
5.5%

Healthcare

2.2%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
6.7%

Technology

0.2%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
8.7%

Financial Services

-

10.7%

Real Estate

ASET
41.6%
MFUL
2.4%

Industrials

ASET
16.3%
MFUL
9.9%

Utilities

ASET
12.8%
MFUL
5.5%

Communication Services

ASET
12.1%
MFUL
8.4%

Energy

ASET
7.8%
MFUL
8.0%

Basic Materials

ASET
5.8%
MFUL
5.5%

Healthcare

ASET
2.2%
MFUL
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

ASET
1.1%
MFUL
6.7%

Technology

ASET
0.2%
MFUL
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ASET
0.1%
MFUL
8.7%

Financial Services

ASET

-

MFUL
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASET vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASET vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASETMFULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

Drawdowns

ASET vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and MFUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASETMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-16.41%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.46%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.50%

+9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

ASET vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASETMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

3.93%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

4.24%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

4.24%

-4.24%

ASET vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASET vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.01%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 1.10% for MFUL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASET and MFUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer