PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASET vs. INCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASET vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INCM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
6.96%
6M
7.85%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


ASET vs. INCM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASET
INCM

Real Estate

41.6%
0.0%

Industrials

16.3%
1.9%

Utilities

12.8%
4.9%

Communication Services

12.1%
1.7%

Energy

7.8%
3.8%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.9%

Healthcare

2.2%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
6.7%

Technology

0.2%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
1.5%

Financial Services

-

8.2%

Real Estate

ASET
41.6%
INCM
0.0%

Industrials

ASET
16.3%
INCM
1.9%

Utilities

ASET
12.8%
INCM
4.9%

Communication Services

ASET
12.1%
INCM
1.7%

Energy

ASET
7.8%
INCM
3.8%

Basic Materials

ASET
5.8%
INCM
1.9%

Healthcare

ASET
2.2%
INCM
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

ASET
1.1%
INCM
6.7%

Technology

ASET
0.2%
INCM
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ASET
0.1%
INCM
1.5%

Financial Services

ASET

-

INCM
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASET vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASET vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASETINCMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

Drawdowns

ASET vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum INCM drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and INCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASETINCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-7.84%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.09%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

Volatility

ASET vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASETINCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

5.22%

-5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.23%

-7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.23%

-7.23%

ASET vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASET vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.06%4.96%5.06%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.38% for INCM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASET and INCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer