ASET vs. CLSM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) and CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASET is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return, while CLSM is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. ASET charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for CLSM.

Performance

ASET vs. CLSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSM

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 13.12%
• YTD: 15.94%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. CLSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	15.40%

Return for Risk

ASET vs. CLSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 70
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. CLSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASET	CLSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.40	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.94	—

Drawdowns

ASET vs. CLSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CLSM drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and CLSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASET	CLSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-27.77%	+27.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.11%	+4.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-16.20%	+16.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASET	CLSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	14.21%	-14.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	12.72%	-12.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	12.72%	-12.72%

ASET vs. CLSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSM's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASET vs. CLSM - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.78%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASET or CLSM?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASET or CLSM?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASET or CLSM?

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between ASET and CLSM?

ASET is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CLSM is Tactical Allocation. ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return, while CLSM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.82% for CLSM.