PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASET vs. BAMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASET vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAMY

1D
0.09%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.37%
6M
2.25%
1Y
11.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


ASET vs. BAMY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASET
BAMY

Real Estate

41.6%
1.3%

Industrials

16.3%
6.6%

Utilities

12.8%
2.5%

Communication Services

12.1%
13.0%

Energy

7.8%
1.5%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.5%

Healthcare

2.2%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
5.3%

Technology

0.2%
40.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
12.6%

Financial Services

-

6.8%

Real Estate

ASET
41.6%
BAMY
1.3%

Industrials

ASET
16.3%
BAMY
6.6%

Utilities

ASET
12.8%
BAMY
2.5%

Communication Services

ASET
12.1%
BAMY
13.0%

Energy

ASET
7.8%
BAMY
1.5%

Basic Materials

ASET
5.8%
BAMY
1.5%

Healthcare

ASET
2.2%
BAMY
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

ASET
1.1%
BAMY
5.3%

Technology

ASET
0.2%
BAMY
40.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ASET
0.1%
BAMY
12.6%

Financial Services

ASET

-

BAMY
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASET vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

BAMY
BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASET vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASETBAMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

Drawdowns

ASET vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BAMY drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and BAMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASETBAMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-6.03%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

ASET vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASETBAMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

4.61%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.03%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.03%

-6.03%

ASET vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASET vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAMY
Brookstone Yield ETF
7.57%7.16%8.20%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 1.48% for BAMY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASET and BAMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer