ASEC vs. QGRO
ASEC (American Century Securitized Credit ETF) and QGRO (American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASEC is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by American Century, while QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index. ASEC is actively managed, while QGRO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
ASEC vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASEC
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- —
ASEC vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.10% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASEC and QGRO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASEC vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ASEC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QGRO
ASEC vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC) and American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASEC | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASEC vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASEC drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEC and QGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASEC | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -32.56% | +32.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.82% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -7.61% | +7.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility
ASEC vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASEC | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39% | 16.04% | -14.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.39% | 21.21% | -19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.39% | 22.90% | -21.51% |
ASEC vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ASEC and QGRO have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
ASEC vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
ASEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than QGRO's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASEC and QGRO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASEC and QGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
ASEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.18% for QGRO.
ASEC is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities.
Find the right allocation for ASEC and QGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer