PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASEC vs. QGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASEC vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC) and American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASEC

1D
0.10%
1M
0.32%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QGRO

1D
-1.17%
1M
1.99%
6M
-0.65%
YTD
1.55%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASEC vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASEC and QGRO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASEC vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASEC vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC) and American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASECQGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

ASEC vs. QGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASEC vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEC drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEC and QGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASECQGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-32.56%

+32.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.82%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-7.61%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

Volatility

ASEC vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASECQGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

16.04%

-14.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.39%

21.21%

-19.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.39%

22.90%

-21.51%

ASEC vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASEC and QGRO have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Dividends

ASEC vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison

ASEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than QGRO's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASEC
American Century Securitized Credit ETF
0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QGRO
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.18%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASEC and QGRO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASEC and QGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

ASEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.18% for QGRO.

ASEC is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASEC and QGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer