PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ASDV.L is traded in USD, while PAXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASDV.L achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than PAXG.L's 8.57% return.


ASDV.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
3.36%
6M
2.58%
1Y
11.90%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
6.66%

PAXG.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
8.57%
6M
6.77%
1Y
12.62%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASDV.L
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
3.36%23.27%4.84%15.47%-15.61%2.54%0.15%20.64%-9.03%29.85%
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
8.57%16.83%-0.21%2.59%-10.69%-1.18%4.58%8.02%-6.39%14.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ASDV.L and PAXG.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2016

0.37

Over the past year, ASDV.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASDV.L
PAXG.L

Financial Services

33.0%
46.1%

Utilities

14.9%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
3.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
3.7%

Industrials

7.3%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
6.0%

Technology

6.7%
1.1%

Communication Services

6.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

4.6%
7.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
14.6%

Energy

-

2.9%

Financial Services

ASDV.L
33.0%
PAXG.L
46.1%

Utilities

ASDV.L
14.9%
PAXG.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

ASDV.L
9.2%
PAXG.L
3.0%

Healthcare

ASDV.L
8.7%
PAXG.L
3.7%

Industrials

ASDV.L
7.3%
PAXG.L
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ASDV.L
6.7%
PAXG.L
6.0%

Technology

ASDV.L
6.7%
PAXG.L
1.1%

Communication Services

ASDV.L
6.2%
PAXG.L
2.7%

Real Estate

ASDV.L
4.6%
PAXG.L
7.8%

Basic Materials

ASDV.L
2.8%
PAXG.L
14.6%

Energy

ASDV.L

-

PAXG.L
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASDV.L
ASDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ASDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXG.L
PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASDV.LPAXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.39

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

3.96

+0.26

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASDV.L and PAXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASDV.LPAXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.94

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.06

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.32

+0.10

Drawdowns

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASDV.L drawdown since its inception was -35.08%, smaller than the maximum PAXG.L drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASDV.L and PAXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASDV.LPAXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.08%

-37.04%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-9.02%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.64%

-23.28%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-29.56%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.75%

-3.57%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-11.15%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.18%

-0.36%

Volatility

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) is 3.59%, while Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that ASDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASDV.LPAXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

4.10%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

10.91%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

13.37%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

21.69%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

26.87%

-11.58%

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASDV.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASDV.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison

ASDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than PAXG.L's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASDV.L
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
2.89%2.85%3.11%2.89%3.63%2.98%2.82%2.65%2.52%1.70%2.37%3.24%
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
0.03%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASDV.L and PAXG.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ASDV.L.

ASDV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ASDV.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASDV.L and PAXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer