ASDV.L vs. APEX.L
ASDV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) and APEX.L (Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ASDV.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD while APEX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ASDV.L returned 4.13%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for APEX.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASDV.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for APEX.L.
Performance
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASDV.L achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than APEX.L's 27.99% return.
ASDV.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.66%
APEX.L
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 27.99%
- 6M
- 30.87%
- 1Y
- 54.00%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASDV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 3.36% | 23.27% | 4.84% | 15.47% | -15.61% | 2.54% | 1.53% |
APEX.L Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc | 27.99% | 32.38% | 11.51% | 4.94% | -18.85% | -3.67% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASDV.L and APEX.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ASDV.L and APEX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Utilities
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Consumer Defensive
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Healthcare
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Industrials
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Consumer Cyclical
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Technology
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Communication Services
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Real Estate
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Basic Materials
ASDV.L
APEX.L
Energy
ASDV.L
-
APEX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ASDV.L
APEX.L
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) and Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASDV.L | APEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.47 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 4.18 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 15.21 | -10.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASDV.L | APEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.71 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.49 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.54 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASDV.L drawdown since its inception was -35.08%, smaller than the maximum APEX.L drawdown of -43.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASDV.L and APEX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASDV.L | APEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.08% | -43.98% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -12.85% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.64% | -18.72% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.08% | -39.58% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -2.90% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -21.17% | +13.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.54% | -0.72% |
Volatility
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) is 3.59%, while Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that ASDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASDV.L | APEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 8.43% | -4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 16.97% | -7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 19.90% | -8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 20.01% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 20.69% | -5.40% |
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASDV.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than APEX.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASDV.L vs. APEX.L - Dividend Comparison
ASDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while APEX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APEX.L Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASDV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.11% | 2.89% | 3.63% | 2.98% | 2.82% | 2.65% | 2.52% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASDV.L and APEX.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APEX.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APEX.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ASDV.L.
ASDV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while APEX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ASDV.L and 0.50% for APEX.L.
Find the right allocation for ASDV.L and APEX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer