PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASD vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASD vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Autism Impact ETF (ASD) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASD

1D
0.51%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UNHW

1D
-0.90%
1M
11.99%
YTD
29.55%
6M
28.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASD vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASD and UNHW is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASD vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Autism Impact ETF (ASD) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASD vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASD vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASD drawdown since its inception was -2.42%, smaller than the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASD and UNHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASDUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-32.28%

+29.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.42%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-10.97%

+10.19%

Volatility

ASD vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASDUNHWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

48.27%

-31.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

48.27%

-31.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

48.27%

-31.02%

ASD vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASD vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

ASD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than UNHW's 18.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ASD
Defiance Autism Impact ETF
0.02%0.00%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
18.42%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASD and UNHW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASD is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASD is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.42%, compared with 0.02% for ASD.

ASD is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ASD and 0.99% for UNHW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASD and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer