ASCI vs. STIP
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while STIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). ASCI is actively managed, while STIP is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for STIP.
Performance
ASCI vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 1.77% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STIP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
ASCI vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 4.02% | 1.37% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.77% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and STIP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STIP
ASCI vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASCI | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -5.50% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -0.29% | -5.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -0.99% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 1.53% | +17.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 2.74% | +16.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 2.45% | +16.57% |
ASCI vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than STIP's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.91% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and STIP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.77% for ASCI.
ASCI is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while STIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.06% for STIP.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer