ASCI vs. NISM
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and NISM (NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.
Performance
ASCI vs. NISM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NISM
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASCI vs. NISM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | -3.62% |
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and NISM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. NISM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. NISM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, which is greater than NISM's maximum drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and NISM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -4.35% | -6.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -1.96% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -1.75% | -0.93% |
Volatility
ASCI vs. NISM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 14.09% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 14.09% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 14.09% | +4.93% |
ASCI vs. NISM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ASCI and NISM have an expense ratio of 0.70%.
Dividends
ASCI vs. NISM - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than NISM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% |
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and NISM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCI and NISM have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.
ASCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.24% for NISM.
They also come from different issuers: abrdn and New York Life Investment Management.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and NISM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer