ASCI vs. KMLM
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while KMLM is a Long-Short fund actively managed by CICC. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
ASCI vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 10.79% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- -0.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- —
ASCI vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 7.39% | 1.11% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 10.79% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and KMLM is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
KMLM
ASCI vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASCI | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.49 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -27.47% | +16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -13.61% | +10.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -12.74% | +10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 11.43% | +7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 14.62% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 14.73% | +3.95% |
ASCI vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than KMLM's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.53% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and KMLM have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 0.75% for ASCI.
ASCI is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while KMLM is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.90% for KMLM.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer