ASCI vs. DCMT
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.
Performance
ASCI vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 34.49% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DCMT
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 34.49%
- 6M
- 33.53%
- 1Y
- 42.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASCI vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 7.39% | 1.11% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 34.49% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and DCMT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
DCMT
ASCI vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASCI | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.20 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and DCMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -11.95% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -3.46% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -3.13% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 18.27% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 15.77% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 15.77% | +2.91% |
ASCI vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than DCMT's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.00% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.73% | 3.67% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and DCMT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.75% for ASCI.
ASCI is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.66% for DCMT.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and DCMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer