ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE
ASCH.DE (abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF) and ACLT.DE (AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds. ASCH.DE is actively managed, while ACLT.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, ASCH.DE returned 47.98% vs 31.52% for ACLT.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASCH.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ACLT.DE.
Performance
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCH.DE achieves a 28.67% return, which is significantly higher than ACLT.DE's 18.77% return.
ASCH.DE
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 28.67%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 47.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 6M
- 19.73%
- 1Y
- 31.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCH.DE abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF | 28.67% | 17.25% |
ACLT.DE AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 18.77% | 10.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCH.DE and ACLT.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ASCH.DE and ACLT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASCH.DE
ACLT.DE
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) and AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASCH.DE | ACLT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.41 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 2.88 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 10.96 | +4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASCH.DE | ACLT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 1.80 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.98 | 1.18 | +1.80 |
Drawdowns
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.06%, smaller than the maximum ACLT.DE drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCH.DE and ACLT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCH.DE | ACLT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -20.54% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -11.07% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | 0.00% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -3.17% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.91% | +0.21% |
Volatility
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE) at 4.52%. This indicates that ASCH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCH.DE | ACLT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 4.52% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 15.32% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 17.73% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 16.77% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 16.77% | -0.95% |
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCH.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ACLT.DE's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCH.DE vs. ACLT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASCH.DE nor ACLT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCH.DE and ACLT.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCH.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCH.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ACLT.DE.
They also come from different issuers: abrdn and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASCH.DE and 0.70% for ACLT.DE.
Find the right allocation for ASCH.DE and ACLT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer