ASCE vs. SCDS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ASCE returned 43.18% vs 43.00% for SCDS. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ASCE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.

Performance

ASCE vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 29.71% return, which is significantly higher than SCDS's 27.08% return.

ASCE

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 1.84%
• 6M: 22.15%
• YTD: 29.71%
• 1Y: 43.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 37.55%

SCDS

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 17.78%
• YTD: 27.08%
• 1Y: 43.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	$5.35M	$3.61M	$2.13M
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	$183.73K	$97.69K	$113.49K

ASCE vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	29.71%	8.46%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	27.08%	10.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and SCDS is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.92

The correlation between ASCE and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASCE vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 86
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 90
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASCE vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASCE	SCDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.36	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.35	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.40	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	4.88	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	17.02	-2.84

ASCE vs. SCDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASCE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the SCDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASCE and SCDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, smaller than the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and SCDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASCE	SCDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.22%	-26.71%	+17.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-8.85%	-0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-0.91%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-4.95%	+2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	2.53%	+0.52%

Volatility

ASCE vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison

Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) at 3.96%. This indicates that ASCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASCE	SCDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	3.96%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.28%	13.50%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.99%	18.37%	+1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.68%	20.86%	-1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	20.86%	-1.18%

ASCE vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASCE vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than SCDS's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%	0.00%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.91%	1.15%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASCE and SCDS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ASCE and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ASCE or SCDS?

ASCE has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to SCDS (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASCE dropped -9.22% vs SCDS's -26.71%.

Which ETF is better, ASCE or SCDS?

On 1-year performance, ASCE leads with 43.18% vs 43.00% for SCDS. On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, SCDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASCE or SCDS?

Over the 1-year period, ASCE has performed better with a 43.18% return vs 43.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASCE or SCDS?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASCE or SCDS?

SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between ASCE and SCDS?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.40% for SCDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.