ASC vs. AAPL
ASC (Ardmore Shipping Corporation) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. ASC operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ASC returned 11.06%/yr vs 29.23%/yr for AAPL. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ASC vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASC achieves a 69.11% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ASC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 11.06%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.23% annualized return.
ASC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 38.61%
- YTD
- 69.11%
- 1Y
- 70.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 42.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
AAPL
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.79%
- 10Y*
- 29.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | $19.18B | $17.68B | $17.20B |
| $9.27M | $9.31M | $11.54M |
ASC vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 69.11% | -10.36% | -8.18% | 5.81% | 326.33% | 3.36% | -63.57% | 93.79% | -41.63% | 8.11% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 13.84% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASC and AAPL is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ASC and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ASC:
$709.56M
AAPL:
$4.54T
ASC:
$2.67
AAPL:
$8.69
ASC:
6.50
AAPL:
35.54
ASC:
0.01
AAPL:
4.68
ASC:
1.93
AAPL:
9.82
ASC:
1.02
AAPL:
42.38
ASC:
$368.29M
AAPL:
$466.82B
ASC:
$139.43M
AAPL:
$227.12B
ASC:
$146.65M
AAPL:
$168.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASC vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
ASC
AAPL
ASC vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASC | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 3.60 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 8.56 | -2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASC vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASC drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASC and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASC | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.11% | -81.80% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.10% | -13.80% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.41% | -33.36% | -28.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.41% | -33.36% | -28.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.21% | -38.52% | -32.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.20% | -9.17% | -8.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -29.52% | -9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.76% | 5.79% | +4.97% |
Volatility
ASC vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 11.52%. This indicates that ASC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASC | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 11.52% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.55% | 20.71% | +9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.34% | 25.91% | +12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.58% | 28.02% | +17.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.12% | 29.12% | +22.00% |
Dividends
ASC vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
ASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 3.74% | 2.83% | 8.89% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 4.80% |
Financials
ASC vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ardmore Shipping Corporation and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASC vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
ASC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a gross profit of 55.55M and revenue of 116.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.8%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.77B and revenue of 109.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
ASC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported an operating income of 49.78M and revenue of 116.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.8%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.70B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.
ASC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a net income of 60.51M and revenue of 116.21M, resulting in a net margin of 52.1%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.79B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASC and AAPL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASC has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to AAPL (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASC dropped -80.11% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASC and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer