PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASA vs. SKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASA vs. SKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASA achieves a -3.76% return, which is significantly lower than SKE's 18.46% return.


ASA

1D
3.28%
1M
-11.35%
YTD
-3.76%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
67.58%
3Y*
55.51%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
16.16%

SKE

1D
7.87%
1M
-9.29%
YTD
18.46%
6M
15.02%
1Y
91.35%
3Y*
77.46%
5Y*
16.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASA vs. SKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited
-3.76%195.60%34.55%5.38%-32.06%-3.48%60.65%44.35%-16.18%-4.94%
SKE
Skeena Resources Ltd
18.46%172.13%78.69%-8.27%-48.99%-4.14%428.16%134.09%-59.87%878.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ASA and SKE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.50

Over the past year, ASA and SKE have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASA:

$1.08B

SKE:

$3.42B

EPS

ASA:

$42.09

SKE:

-CA$2.12

PB Ratio

ASA:

0.98

SKE:

26.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASA:

$137.30M

SKE:

CA$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASA:

$3.98M

SKE:

-CA$1.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASA:

$444.29M

SKE:

-CA$109.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASA vs. SKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASA
ASA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ASA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ASA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SKE
SKE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASA vs. SKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASASKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.76

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

7.15

-1.58

ASA vs. SKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the SKE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASA and SKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASA vs. SKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASA drawdown since its inception was -80.36%, which is greater than SKE's maximum drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASA and SKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASASKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.36%

-75.69%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.50%

-34.71%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.50%

-38.40%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.93%

-75.69%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.36%

-26.26%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.53%

-34.38%

-8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.97%

13.37%

-0.40%

Volatility

ASA vs. SKE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is 18.26%, while Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) has a volatility of 22.02%. This indicates that ASA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASASKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.26%

22.02%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.96%

45.45%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.02%

59.38%

-10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.54%

58.32%

-22.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.56%

386.82%

-351.26%

Dividends

ASA vs. SKE - Dividend Comparison

ASA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while SKE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited
0.12%0.10%0.20%0.13%0.14%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.32%0.35%0.36%0.56%
SKE
Skeena Resources Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ASA vs. SKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited and Skeena Resources Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
133.95M
0
(ASA) Total Revenue
(SKE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ASA values in USD, SKE values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


ASA and SKE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKE has higher volatility (22.02%) compared to ASA (18.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASA dropped -80.36% vs SKE's -75.69%.

SKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASA and SKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer