PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASA vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASA vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASA achieves a -3.76% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.


ASA

1D
3.28%
1M
-11.35%
YTD
-3.76%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
67.58%
3Y*
55.51%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
16.16%

PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-6.85%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASA vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited
-3.76%195.60%34.55%5.38%-32.06%-3.48%2.20%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ASA and PLTR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASA:

$1.08B

PLTR:

$329.05B

EPS

ASA:

$42.09

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

ASA:

1.36

PLTR:

144.03

PEG Ratio

ASA:

0.00

PLTR:

0.84

PS Ratio

ASA:

7.87

PLTR:

62.90

PB Ratio

ASA:

0.98

PLTR:

38.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASA:

$137.30M

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASA:

$3.98M

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

ASA:

$444.29M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASA vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASA
ASA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ASA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ASA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASA vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASAPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.03

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

-0.14

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

-0.25

+5.82

ASA vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASA and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASA vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASA drawdown since its inception was -80.36%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASA and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASAPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.36%

-84.62%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.50%

-38.22%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.50%

-40.61%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.93%

-79.14%

+30.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.36%

-38.22%

+8.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.53%

-40.27%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.97%

21.23%

-8.26%

Volatility

ASA vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) has a higher volatility of 18.26% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 17.16%. This indicates that ASA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASAPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.26%

17.16%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.96%

38.32%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.02%

50.83%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.54%

65.44%

-29.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.56%

69.75%

-34.19%

Dividends

ASA vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

ASA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited
0.12%0.10%0.20%0.13%0.14%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.32%0.35%0.36%0.56%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ASA vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
133.95M
1.63B
(ASA) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ASA and PLTR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASA has higher volatility (18.26%) compared to PLTR (17.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASA dropped -80.36% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

ASA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASA and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer