AS vs. MINT
AS (Amer Sports, Inc) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past year, AS returned -2.74% vs 4.45% for MINT. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AS vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AS achieves a -4.93% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 2.47% return.
AS
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 1Y
- -2.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.81%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $145.99M | $126.51M | $148.20M | |
| $141.60M | $159.28M | $155.81M |
AS vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AS Amer Sports, Inc | -4.93% | 33.58% | 108.66% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 2.47% | 4.74% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between AS and MINT is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AS vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
AS
MINT
AS vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amer Sports, Inc (AS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -51.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 14.85 | -13.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 90.98 | -91.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 703.66 | -704.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AS vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AS drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AS and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -4.62% | -36.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.78% | -0.05% | -28.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.37% | 0.00% | -15.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -0.17% | -13.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.74% | 0.01% | +15.73% |
Volatility
AS vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Amer Sports, Inc (AS) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.10%. This indicates that AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 0.10% | +10.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.37% | 0.22% | +30.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.02% | 0.28% | +41.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 0.58% | +48.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 0.94% | +47.99% |
Dividends
AS vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS Amer Sports, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 3.84% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AS and MINT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AS has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to MINT (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AS dropped -40.71% vs MINT's -4.62%.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.93 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AS and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer