PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARVR vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARVR vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 13.46% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.60% return.


ARVR

1D
-1.28%
1M
-2.23%
6M
19.38%
YTD
13.46%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.25%

EINC

1D
-1.74%
1M
0.75%
6M
14.53%
YTD
24.60%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
26.54%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
11.04%
ALL TIME*
0.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.13K$9.51K$34.61K
$736.56K$2.64M$2.24M

ARVR vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARVR
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF
13.46%29.07%10.11%43.39%-17.45%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
24.60%7.11%42.79%15.55%-5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ARVR and EINC is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2022

0.28

The correlation between ARVR and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARVR vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARVR
ARVR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ARVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARVR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ARVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARVR vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARVREINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

3.42

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

8.30

-5.11

ARVR vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARVR and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARVR vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.40%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and EINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARVREINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.40%

-87.55%

+61.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.73%

-7.89%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-16.01%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.17%

-5.54%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-43.81%

+37.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

3.24%

+3.02%

Volatility

ARVR vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 5.14%. This indicates that ARVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARVREINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

5.14%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.27%

12.44%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.31%

15.55%

+6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.76%

19.51%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.76%

25.33%

-1.57%

ARVR vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARVR vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than EINC's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARVR
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF
0.66%0.53%0.81%0.11%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
4.31%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARVR and EINC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARVR has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to EINC (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.40% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 3-year performance, EINC leads with 26.54% vs 21.38% for ARVR. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EINC has performed better with a 26.54% return vs 21.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ARVR.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 0.66% for ARVR.

ARVR is categorized as Technology Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. ARVR tracks Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 0.46% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARVR and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer